Post by account_disabled on Jan 2, 2024 3:44:47 GMT -5
Asubsequent amendments and additions were the subject of the constitutional review and by decisions no. of March published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April and no. of November published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of December the constitutional court rejected as inadmissible the invoked exceptions holding that it is the exclusive competence of the legislator to choose the solution he considers appropriate in order to establish jobs under special exceptional or normal conditions depending on working conditions.
In the same sense by Decision no. of October published in the Official Country Email List Gazette of Romania Part I no. of November the Constitutional Court found that all the measures presented establishing jobs and units with special conditions were included finally in the text of Law no. which is intended to be a materialization of art. para. from Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions. . Also analyzing the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. lit. e from Law no. . with subsequent amendments and additions as well as the provisions of point of annex no. to this law in relation to the criticisms made regarding the violation of art. of the.
Romanian Decision no. of May published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of July that due to the different conditions imposed by the regulation subsequent to Law no. with the subsequent amendments and additions compared to the previous legislation as well as the procedures for placement in special working conditions in practice it is not possible to put a sign of equality between the people who previously worked in the I work group and those who.
In the same sense by Decision no. of October published in the Official Country Email List Gazette of Romania Part I no. of November the Constitutional Court found that all the measures presented establishing jobs and units with special conditions were included finally in the text of Law no. which is intended to be a materialization of art. para. from Law no. with subsequent amendments and additions. . Also analyzing the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. lit. e from Law no. . with subsequent amendments and additions as well as the provisions of point of annex no. to this law in relation to the criticisms made regarding the violation of art. of the.
Romanian Decision no. of May published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of July that due to the different conditions imposed by the regulation subsequent to Law no. with the subsequent amendments and additions compared to the previous legislation as well as the procedures for placement in special working conditions in practice it is not possible to put a sign of equality between the people who previously worked in the I work group and those who.